From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jul 14 11:24:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ftf.dk (mail.ftf.net [129.142.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136BC15468 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:24:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from regnauld@ftf.net) Received: from ns.int.ftf.net (fw2.ftf.dk [192.168.1.2] (may be forged)) by mail.ftf.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3/gw-ftf-1.2) with ESMTP id UAA18410; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:23:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.ftf.dk: Host fw2.ftf.dk [192.168.1.2] (may be forged) claimed to be ns.int.ftf.net Received: (from regnauld@localhost) by ns.int.ftf.net (8.9.2/8.9.3) id UAA20756; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:38:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19990714203806.46887@ns.int.ftf.net> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:38:06 +0200 From: Phil Regnauld To: David Schwartz Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ? References: <000001bece24$65a5c5e0$021d85d1@youwant.to> <000201bece25$066b7510$021d85d1@youwant.to> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <000201bece25$066b7510$021d85d1@youwant.to>; from David Schwartz on Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 11:16:42AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386 Organization: FTFnet Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Schwartz writes: > > threads. Log-based system. There's nothing I know of in any UNIX > > That should read "log-based file system". I'm talking about NTFS. And it > beats an fsck any day. Doesn't beat other LFSes. And what is it good at ? Integrity ? Fragmentation (hah!) Performance ? -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message