From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Jan 10 12:47:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mail12.speakeasy.net (mail12.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.212]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42ED37B402 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:47:32 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 30002 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 20:47:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO laptop.baldwin.cx) ([64.81.54.73]) (envelope-sender ) by mail12.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Jan 2002 20:47:31 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3C3DE7BE.D266C09F@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:46:53 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: Terry Lambert Subject: Re: Linux moves to per CPU run queues Cc: smp@FreeBSD.ORG, Garance A Drosihn , Julian Elischer Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 10-Jan-02 Terry Lambert wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: >> I have doubts that it will make a big differnce on busy systems with real >> world applications. Maybe it may help a bit with machines with many many >> processors. > > The problem with Intel geeks is that their definitions go: > > "one, two, three, four, many many". "hrair" CPUs. :) Seriously, first we need to let KSE settle in its changes to the system before we do this or something like it. KSE can be made to do this w/o too much trouble. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message