From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 9 07:49:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467B616A46F for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF3043D7B for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:49:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.6/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k597nbbS099474 ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:49:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 164 Received: from galois4.math.jussieu.fr (galois4.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.119]) by riemann.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.6/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k597nZgn050086 ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:49:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from galois4.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by galois4.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k597nZat030227 ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:49:35 +0200 Received: (from jas@localhost) by galois4.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k597nZfh030226; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:49:35 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:49:35 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: Massimo Lusetti Message-ID: <20060609074935.GA29910@math.jussieu.fr> References: <200606090709.k5979fQ9020571@lurza.secnetix.de> <1149837981.4303.3.camel@massimo.datacode.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1149837981.4303.3.camel@massimo.datacode.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.164]); Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:49:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.2/1522/Thu Jun 8 17:54:38 2006 on shiva.jussieu.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 44892811.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-R ? 6-Stable ? 5.5-R ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:49:43 -0000 Le 09/06/2006 à 09:26:20+0200, Massimo Lusetti a écrit > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 09:09 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > No, I meant RELENG_6_1, which is the security fix branch > > for 6.1-Release. Albert wrote that he would prefer not > > to use RELENG_6 (a.k.a. "6-stable") on a production machine, > > therefore my recommendation is RELENG_6_1. > > If read right he is already running a RELENG_6. Well....yes but after many many crash during many mounth I've running a Releng_6 (6 April 2006) and it's don't crash. And I don't have update. Now the server crash yesterday (monday) and I'm asking if it's good idea to update again. > > > Of course, there might be good reasons to run RELENG_6 > > anyway, in case that significant NFS fixes have gone in > > after the release (which I'm not aware of). But that > > decision is up to Albert himself. > > Actually if i remember right the NFS fix are gone in the RELENG_6 and > not in RELENG_6_1 OK, that's mean if I update I need to update to RELENG_6 not RELENG_6_1. Lots of thanks. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Fri Jun 9 09:46:58 CEST 2006