From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Sep 23 01:40:07 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA28626 for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 01:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA28593; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 01:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 01:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199609230840.BAA28593@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: Peter Childs Subject: Re: bin/1665: libexec-telnetd deficiency Reply-To: Peter Childs Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR bin/1665; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Childs To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, pjchilds@imforei.apana.org.au Subject: Re: bin/1665: libexec-telnetd deficiency Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 18:00:12 +0930 (CST) > >>Synopsis: telnetd doesn't use gettytab %m %r %v %s tags > > This feature was Considered Harmful and removed when it was first > introduced in getty. The broken version of it that you fixed in > another PR sneaked in with the sgttyb -> termios conversion. Ok. I didn't really expect the telnetd changes to get committed, but if the getty stuff isn't going to be fixed then support for it should be removed, and the man page changed to reflect such (talking about bin/1664 - libexec/getty and gettytab.5 ) I'm not sure why it is considered harmful(?) either, but thats why i'm not doing the commits, and you guys are :) Regards, Peter -- Peter Childs --- http://www.imforei.apana.org.au/~pjchilds Finger pjchilds@al.imforei.apana.org.au for public PGP key Drag me, drop me, treat me like an object!