Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:59:53 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running large DB's on FreeBSD Message-ID: <200610251259.57388.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <453D49D2.1010705@rogers.com> References: <453D49D2.1010705@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2345726.YaB8Z5l6Dc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 23 October 2006 6:01 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote: > I'm not exactly informed as to the specific workload yet, however i know > the database will have several million rows and be larger than 10GB. No offense, but that's a pretty small database. Also, IMHO the crazy part= =20 is using MySQL over PostgreSQL. It's hardly any faster, and you have to do= =20 a *lot* of client-side work to emulate PostgreSQL's built-in functions. =20 Unless you use the much slower InnoDB that's now owned by Oracle, in which= =20 case MySQL gets most of those features (but is no faster than PostgreSQL=20 would be). =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2345726.YaB8Z5l6Dc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFP6Yd5sRg+Y0CpvERAukxAKCVHPCSSieEfO08BnC/Gk0GqWiXYACglU1t xTyEouzIx4KljXLINVrqC2w= =sl4/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2345726.YaB8Z5l6Dc--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610251259.57388.kirk>