From owner-freebsd-scsi Fri Feb 23 16:31:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8C937B491 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:31:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from zeppo.feral.com (IDENT:mjacob@zeppo [192.67.166.71]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA27587; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:31:17 -0800 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:31:15 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Lauri Laupmaa Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adaptec F950 fibre channel support ? In-Reply-To: <3A96FF62.6DB1B2D9@inspiral.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org None at present except some reported DPT support which I've never seen in actuality. The F950 never shipped (I have one). That chipset is now owned by JNI (aka 'emerald'). I have plans to get to 'RSN' the LSI-Logic chipset. I have no aggressive plans to to try and cope with JNI (either Tachyon based or with Emerald). I have some interest in Emulex. However- Emulex (and JNI) has no interest in FreeBSD- and barely some interest in Linux. If you can convince Emulex or JNI to be more open with their specs and you can get them to cough up the h/w, I can probably get some funding to work on this. -matt > Hi > > What fibre channel scsi controllers are work under > freebsd[stable/current] apart from qlogic ? > > TIA > > -- > L. > > Another problem with Linux is that the historically best distributions > (such as Debian) have no corporate accountability, while the commercially > popular distributions (such as Red Hat) are buggy-as-hell and dumbed-down. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message