Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 18:44:02 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: Andrew Stesin <stesin@breaker.tormoz.net>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug? VLANs, fxp, Catalyst and link0 story Message-ID: <20020915154402.GA1136@iv.nn.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020915103800.03d6c5f0@192.168.0.12> References: <20020915165141.V871-100000@chour.hostmaster.net.ua> <5.1.0.14.0.20020915103800.03d6c5f0@192.168.0.12>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 10:43:53, mike (Mike Tancsa) wrote about "Re: Bug? VLANs, fxp, Catalyst and link0 story":
MT> Why do you need the link0 portion ?
This question was in original post. Why do you ask Andrew? It's his question.
MT> Also, whatever you assign fxp0 will be part of the Cisco native VLAN So
MT> just try
As far as you can read this isn't enough.
Code of fxp driver consists following clause:
/*
* Attempt to load microcode if requested.
*/
if (ifp->if_flags & IFF_LINK0 && (sc->flags & FXP_FLAG_UCODE) == 0)
fxp_load_ucode(sc);
Possibly one should request detailed version of fxp cards in question.
/netch
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020915154402.GA1136>