Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 14:24:58 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Floppies for FreeBSD Message-ID: <15686.872457898@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 24 Aug 1997 18:49:09 %2B0200." <19970824184909.PH41183@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> There should be no user-visible mount_foo executables at all. :-) > Use -t foo if you need. Yes, but since there are, would it not stand to reason that mount_ufs should contain the UFS smarts so that mount turns into nothing more than a "switch" for which you say say that the rule is always: 1. In the absence of -t, type ufs is assumed. 2. For any value of type, mount_$type exists. ? Sorry, but it just seems more orthogonal to me. ;) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15686.872457898>