From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 6 22:43:34 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD72F1597D47 for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 22:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adam@electricembers.coop) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6268DCC6 for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 22:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adam@electricembers.coop) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DFF6B1597D46; Mon, 6 May 2019 22:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB281597D45 for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 22:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adam@electricembers.coop) Received: from npomail1.electricembers.net (mail.electricembers.net [208.90.215.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.electricembers.net", Issuer "RapidSSL RSA CA 2018" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F23F38DCC3; Mon, 6 May 2019 22:43:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adam@electricembers.coop) Received: from private by npomail1.electricembers.net; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=electricembers.coop; s=internal; t=1557182603; bh=lT1qsW9QmWZiVdREePjGk2/Ibn+tECdKJP6UkLEia/w=; l=1871; h=Subject:To:From:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=r00Zm+j05bu8ycguaBsgUvnokVk0MdbUgwoYIjDDeb4jfHjLguPQ5SZSdAhZJYoIW IatCS2Q6gylMBRVAhW8wRra/Ra8bP2yurKV3TDmKd51Nc9YzTzETxNJlS4RFI1ZGOL 66nyG/YCN51A2FHWTIsyaRSl3qlWorX3C1MlJQ/E= Subject: Re: cclient, panda-cclient, and php71-imap (and others?) To: ports@freebsd.org, tz@freebsd.org References: <20190424194322.GX57102@graf.pompo.net> From: Adam Bernstein Message-ID: <95305dad-d914-d534-8083-06dddf8d0e8e@electricembers.coop> Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 15:43:22 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190424194322.GX57102@graf.pompo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: F23F38DCC3 X-Spamd-Bar: -------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=electricembers.coop header.s=internal header.b=r00Zm+j0; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=electricembers.coop; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adam@electricembers.coop designates 208.90.215.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adam@electricembers.coop X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.44 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mail.electricembers.net]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[electricembers.coop:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[73.215.90.208.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[smtp.electricembers.net,smtp.electricembers.net,smtp.electricembers.net]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[electricembers.coop,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.981,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:32329, ipnet:208.90.212.0/22, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[electricembers.coop:s=internal]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-3.75)[ip: (-9.86), ipnet: 208.90.212.0/22(-4.93), asn: 32329(-3.91), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 22:43:35 -0000 Thierry et al. - Thanks for the reply and for adding to my understanding here. I haven't seen any reply from the php71-imap maintainer; have I missed it? It does seem like the most immediate solution here would be to change the default build option for that port, and perhaps others that use cclient. Of course getting cclient (and panda-cclient if it's in need too) back to fully maintained status would be even better, but that would need someone new to step up. I'm willing, but I've started reading up on what it would take to be a port maintainer, and concluded it's far beyond me at present. :( adam On 4/24/2019 12:43 PM, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le lun. 22 avr. 19 à 20:05:07 +0200, Adam Bernstein > écrivait : > >> It seems to me that 'mail/cclient' should be marked as broken with >> current OpenSSL >> (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226621), and possibly >> as unmaintained, and that all other ports that use it (the one that >> concerns us currently is 'php71-imap') should switch to using the fork >> 'panda-cclient' instead. That fork has this bug fixed already, and >> php71-imap offers panda-cclient as a build option but not as the default. > > Indeed, I've been using Panda for a long time, and it is a safer > replacement for cclient and uw-imap, and we could set it by default. > (adding PHP maintainer to Cc:) > >> Or am I missing something? If not, is there anything we can do to >> facilitate? > > However, note that Panda is not bulletproof, and mostly unmaintained > too. Someone tries to revive this project and help is wanted: see > https://github.com/nkhorman/panda-imap/issues > > Regards, > -- Electric Embers Cooperative Handcrafted hosting, powering the fires of change electricembers.coop (800) 843-6197 / (415) 992-6916