Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 30 Apr 1995 19:23:01 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Richard Toren <rpt@miles.sso.loral.com>
To:        hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   pthreads progress report
Message-ID:  <Pine.SUN.3.91.950430191755.1903B-100000@hps>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have been communication with  Christopher Provenzano <proven@MIT.EDU>
trying to get his pthreads package to build. One point that he keeps 
mentioning is:

>BTW Do you have access to freefall? I'd like to get the other problems 
>resolved and I'me sure it's a problem with environements. I copied the
>last release (beta 2) onto freefall and with the exception of the 
>configure problem (which the patch I posted fixed) I had no trouble with the build.

Is there a difference between building on freefall, and what was deliverd 
in 2.0R?

I found that if I add a '-traditional' to the top makefile, I 
can get past the initial step (the assemblies) but it then needs to have 
the traditional flag removed to compile the rest.


                         ====================================================
Rip Toren               | The bad news is that C++ is not an object-oriented |
rpt@miles.sso.loral.com | programming language. .... The good news is that   |
                        | C++ supports object-oriented programming.          |
                        |    C++ Programming & Fundamental Concepts          |
                        |     by Anderson & Heinze                           |
                         ====================================================



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.950430191755.1903B-100000>