From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 19 07:05:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1B4106566B; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 07:05:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: from nskntqsrv01p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntqsrv01p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495FB8FC08; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 07:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com ([124.188.161.100]) by nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20101119044139.EVJD24865.nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 04:41:39 +0000 Received: from johnny.reilly.home ([124.188.161.100]) by nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20101119044139.GCRY25056.nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com@johnny.reilly.home>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 04:41:39 +0000 Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:41:29 +1100 From: Andrew Reilly To: Alexander Best Message-ID: <20101119044129.GA4063@johnny.reilly.home> References: <4CE50849.106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4CE52177.3020306@freebsd.org> <20101118182324.GA36312@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101118182324.GA36312@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150202.4CE60003.00B0,ss=1,fgs=0 X-SIH-MSG-ID: rRg6ENH9TAD0zmQs0WyzOwJxyArnqyN48Z4QX81loRIGTUDCp8DeQ9rVMfpRv9GgxD9FJhqBNGUhaa/tTY3Rs9mK Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current , FreeBSD Stable , Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: TTY task group scheduling X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 07:05:17 -0000 On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM +0000, Alexander Best wrote: > you think so? judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo. On Linux. Have you ever seen those sorts of UI problems on FreeBSD? I don't watch much video on my systems, but I haven't seen that. FreeBSD has always been good at keeping user-interactive processes responsive while compiles or what-not are going on in the background. Cheers, -- Andrew