Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Oct 2001 15:35:51 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 64 bit times revisited..
Message-ID:  <200110271935.f9RJZpp88003@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200110271655.f9RGtX947498@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <XFMail.011027084545.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200110271655.f9RGtX947498@apollo.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 09:55:33 -0700 (PDT), Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> said:

>     Who says we are breaking C90?

C90 does not have `long long', period, end of discussion.

-GAWollman


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110271935.f9RJZpp88003>