From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Dec 11 22:37:28 1995
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA11025
          for stable-outgoing; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 22:37:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA11019
          for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 22:37:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA18034; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 22:36:05 -0800
To: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>
cc: stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Bringing stuff into 2.1? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Dec 1995 23:31:52 MST."
             <199512120631.XAA08347@rocky.sri.MT.net> 
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 22:36:05 -0800
Message-ID: <18032.818750165@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> All right.  What kind of time-frame are we looking at here?  The reason
> I'm asking is I want to shake out some of the more 'critical' portions
> of the merge (any of the kernel mods I'd like someone else to look over
> before they go in) and I don't want to push things to the wire.  Is a
> 'drop-dead' date of February a workable goal, so it leaves us all of
> February for a Real(tm) beta-test cycle?

I'd like to start wrapping things up in February.  I didn't really
anticipate a prolonged BETA test cycle since that would sort of imply
that we screwed up and brought in *too* many changes.  This is
supposed to be a fairly simple `re-roll the release' cycle, and if it
isn't then we need to consider just what we did to make that not
happen (and kill someone for it :-).

					Jordan