Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:28:08 +0100
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 apic_vector.s local_apic.c mp_machdep.c src/sys/i386/include apicvar.h smp.h src/sys/i386/isa clock.c 
Message-ID:  <1667.1107977288@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:21:45 MST." <420A62C9.80405@freebsd.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <420A62C9.80405@freebsd.org>, Scott Long writes:

>I did some testing under an earlier version of this work and found no
>appreciable change in things like I/O and network thoroughput.  What you
>committed is actually more efficient, so there might indeed be a (small)
>gain.

I ran a short round of specialized benchmarks (interrupt latency etc)
and found nothing statistically significant, but a tendency in favour
of the patch.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1667.1107977288>