Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 12:17:00 -0500 (EST) From: James FitzGibbon <james@spirit.cis.uoguelph.ca> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>, ports@FreeBSD.org, gibbs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NO_PACKAGE and NO_CDROM Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960404121552.4806A-100000@spirit.cis.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <6270.828614341@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 4 Apr 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> Anyone object to the idea of ports-{foo,bar,...} going away and being
> replaced by one ports-all? Does anyone here even sup a partial
> ports tree? I know that I never have..
The only thing I can see as an advantage of the ports-* structure is that
if one doesn't run X, or doesn't have need for the russian or japanese
ports, they can leave them out of the supscan. Other than that, no, I
usually grab the whole ports tree every week.
--
j.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| James FitzGibbon james@nexis.net |
| Integrator, The Nexis Group Voice/Fax : 416 410-0100 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960404121552.4806A-100000>