From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 14:44:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE2B16A4CF for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:44:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from basement.kutulu.org (pcp03610121pcs.longhl01.md.comcast.net [68.49.239.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F8D43D2E for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:44:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kutulu@kutulu.org) Received: from wombat.localnet (wombat.localnet [192.168.69.3]) by basement.kutulu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679E1A9B1 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:44:32 -0500 (EST) Received: by wombat.localnet (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4CB93B858; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:44:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:44:32 -0500 From: Michael Edenfield To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031208224431.GB60526@wombat.localnet> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM" Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-Accept-Language: en X-PGP-Key: http://www.kutulu.org/pgp/kutulu.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1CE0 3C31 7013 D529 406D 37DC 09CC CD84 A46C 878F User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: ad0: FAILURE - SET_MULTI -- should I be worried? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 22:44:34 -0000 --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Over the weekend I upgraded a couple of our backup mail servers from 5.1 to 5.2, and noticed that one of them are giving me this error: ad0: FAILURE - SET_MULTI status=51 error=4 GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xc165f560 ad0: 19470MB [39560/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 I was wondering if this error meant there was something wrong with the hardware, that something is "about to be" wrong with the hardware, or if this is just a harmless warning? These are old PII Celeron systems, so I wouldn't be shocked if the drive is about to explode, but if this is some advanced warning I hopefully have time to replace it :) --Mike --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/1P7PCczNhKRsh48RAmjoAJ9/e0yP9V7/RmjISRIBLf8p4dghqwCeKzFn UIg+i836+Z1Nh+cQsx1cTdo= =dTe8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM--