From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 19 13:23:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF9C106566B for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stuartb@4gh.net) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990788FC08 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2012 09:22:59 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BZA68932; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:22:59 -0400 X-Auth-ID: stuartb.4gh@starpower.net Received: from 216-164-52-14.c3-0.slvr-ubr1.lnh-slvr.md.cable.rcn.com (HELO freeman.4gh.net) ([216.164.52.14]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2012 09:22:59 -0400 Received: by freeman.4gh.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 67079130E07; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:22:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freeman.4gh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A759130DCC for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:22:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:22:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Stuart Barkley To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20120916225732.00000e22@unknown> Message-ID: References: <4B739CF4-5D1D-4FE0-83FD-6987DCB40866@gmail.com> <201209151453.41118.hselasky@c2i.net> <50547CA3.2010209@gmail.com> <20120916225732.00000e22@unknown> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Sound system developement question X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:23:07 -0000 On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 at 16:57 -0000, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > If you are very concerned about this, buy "monster" brand cables. > > Do you have a link to a trustworty scientific double-blind test > where a monster-cable did _not_ lose against a muuuuch cheaper > cable? If not please consider to rethink the way you recommend them > here. Sorry for the digression and additional 'noise' emails. I should have put in the right form of smiley there. Even better, I should have just skipped the un-useful sentence completely. For the record: I have no belief that Monster brand cables are any better than other good quality cables. I also believe the only problem with most monster cables is their cost, they will work fine. This is just uninformed opinion. Stuart -- I've never been lost; I was once bewildered for three days, but never lost! -- Daniel Boone