Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:08:58 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201796] Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk: Set PostgreSQL 9.5 as default Message-ID: <bug-201796-13-cedM4YkFfG@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-201796-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-201796-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D201796 Torsten Zuehlsdorff <tz@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #183654|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #39 from Torsten Zuehlsdorff <tz@freebsd.org> --- Created attachment 183673 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D183673&action= =3Dedit Patch to update default version of PostgreSQL to 9.5 with UPDATING > from my experience for update pg,maybe should mention the space will be d= oubled=20 > in upgrade process.or using pg_upgrade hardlink mode is better because of= space=20 > and speed. > Also mention the replication slave upgrade using rsync --hard-link to spe= edup. Thanks for the extra warning. I added it to the UPDATING instruction! > Note,pg_upgrade has been moved to the core server from controb,so the con= trob=20 > port is not needed when upgrade. While i did know this, i didn't know (nor did i test) how the usage of contrib-modules effects pg_upgrade. I was under the impression that using o= ne of the contrib-modules results in needing the contrib modules when executing pg_upgrade? Since there is no harm, i just let it in there. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-201796-13-cedM4YkFfG>