Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:50:18 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@freebsd.org> To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: ports tree tagging again Message-ID: <20060818065018.GB78016@underworld.novel.ru> In-Reply-To: <44E47FFB.2090107@utdallas.edu> References: <20060816123335.GA42090@underworld.novel.ru> <20060816172835.GA29719@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060817053955.GD62148@underworld.novel.ru> <20060817124739.GA3643@xor.obsecurity.org> <44E47FFB.2090107@utdallas.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul Schmehl wrote: > As a maintainer of several ports, I can assure you that I would not be=20 > interested in doing *more* work on the ports than I already am. And my= =20 > ports are relatively simple ones. Imagine the guys who do KDE and Gnome= =20 > and Xorg being asked to at least double their work..... I know that Gnome and Xorg people has their own repo. That could be avoided if we had two branches. =20 > Sometimes you have to keep in mind that we're all volunteers here and=20 > many of us are already very busy with paying jobs as well. >=20 > If someone wants to pay my salary, I'd be happy to work on FreeBSD stuff= =20 > fulltime. Blah.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060818065018.GB78016>