Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 22:38:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Marc van Woerkom <van.woerkom@netcologne.de> To: mestery@visi.com Cc: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Gogo vs. Bladeenc, Part II Message-ID: <199907292038.WAA01592@oranje.my.domain> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907290631520.29323-100000@isis.visi.com> (mestery@visi.com) References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907290631520.29323-100000@isis.visi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Gogo, which is amazing to me since I previously used bladeenc, which > gave me 2-3:1 times. And there is no difference in the output quality. > Gogo works nice, give it a try. Any explanation for this miracle? . Assembly? . Different psycho-acoustics? (neglecting that stuff that the human ear + mind don't notice too much) Regards, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907292038.WAA01592>