From owner-freebsd-current  Wed May 12 11:43: 3 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FAF1530D
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 12 May 1999 11:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id UAA36364;
	Wed, 12 May 1999 20:42:50 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa <y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp>
Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>,
	current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c
References: <199905120327.DAA09999@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 12 May 1999 20:42:49 +0200
In-Reply-To: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa's message of "Wed, 12 May 1999 12:27:45 +0900"
Message-ID: <xzpn1za3z9y.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa <y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp> writes:
> > mechanism was unacceptable -- else we would have used it years ago.
> It is not formal core decision.

On whose authority do you say that? Garrett is a core team member.

> > Our policy in all areas has been that we'd rather do the Right Thing
> > than follow the crowd.
> new-bus is wrong way. You are misunderstanding 4.4BSD mechanism.

Then explain to us why newbus is wrong and why the 4.4BSD scheme is
right.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message