Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:36:08 +0000 From: Tim Bishop <tim-lists@bishnet.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/58260: New Port: print/lilypond-devel Message-ID: <20031117003608.GA5555@carrick.bishnet.net> In-Reply-To: <20031117001330.GA18934@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20031019233208.80051.qmail@mail.frobs.net> <20031116191222.GA30181@mail.webmonster.de> <20031116214023.GA16310@xor.obsecurity.org> <3FB80FB3.5090205@ciam.ru> <20031117001330.GA18934@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 04:13:30PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 03:00:51AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > >On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:12:00PM +0100, Patrick Atamaniuk wrote: > > > > > >>pr may be closed, committed this on portrookies for early adopters. > > > > > >So you don't want anyone to commit it to FreeBSD? > > > > I think, he meant they are changed and freshest versions can be found on > > portrookies. > > > > Am I right, Patrik? :) > > It's great to see enthusiasm for the new "portrookies" project, but at > the moment most committers are not using it, so unless the new version > of your port is available in gnats most committers will not find it. I wonder what the view of "portrookies" is amongst the committers? Is it a good thing? Will it help or hinder getting new ports into the main ports tree? Tim. -- Tim Bishop http://www.bishnet.net/tim PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031117003608.GA5555>