Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:08:21 +0200 From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> Subject: Re: how to test for linux base version? (googleearth) Message-ID: <20091018210821.GA55095@triton8.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <33329848@ipt.ru> References: <20091017154404.GA80599@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <99413628@ipt.ru> <20091018174157.GB99191@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <99401887@ipt.ru> <20091018202545.GA53402@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <33329848@ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:47:19AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> writes: > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:13:20AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> writes: > >> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 02:30:43PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> >> Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> writes: > >> >> > >> >> > I just got reminded to add a linux base version check to astro/google-earth > >> >> > (It now needs recent linux libstdc++.so.6 with GLIBCXX_3.4.9 that only > >> >> > is in f9 or f10, you can do > >> >> > >> >> First of, I'd recommend leaving f9 alone (I'm going to deprecate all > >> >> linux base ports except fc4 and f10 soon). > >> >> > >> > Ah Ok. (Does f10 work well enough on 7.x yet?) > >> > >> Well, there is no choice anyway. We do have fc4 and f10 infractructure > >> ports. I think it's wise to use apropriate base ports. I don't think > >> there is any difference between f9 and f10 linux base ports. > >> > > Oh I was more thinking of f8 since we have nonbase ports for that too... > > Hm, but it were you who said that only f9 and f10 base ports had > libstdc++.so.6 with apropriate symbols. ;-) > Oh yeah, that comment was meant more in general, not for this specific port. > About f8 ports. Almost all current linux ports play well with f10 > ports at 7.2, 8.0 and 9-CURRENT. Only one exception I'm aware is > acroread9 (a linux syscall should be implemented). If those ports > (f8) are usefull for 7.0 and 7.1 (6.x doesn't have apropriate > kernel sources) then they should stay until 7.0 and 7.1 are EOLed. Ok. Cheers, Juergen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091018210821.GA55095>