Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:35:35 +0400
From:      Andrey Fesenko <f0andrey@gmail.com>
To:        Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ZFS bug or feature
Message-ID:  <CA%2BK5SrNzqiQKQaPRV0wUkysC0XtFQQLa3SzKcKctUe2%2BaJdmTA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFHbX1Kh-tZRHkNPqUmqUT1XwPEa-RoVM=ov=d%2BXz5byDJr_-A@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CA%2BK5SrNzRnbUcDmX-dBktCtoUm=_65%2BJS0jZZnLDHs1pXAU_kg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFHbX1Kh-tZRHkNPqUmqUT1XwPEa-RoVM=ov=d%2BXz5byDJr_-A@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm confused, what is the bug or feature? Has it added the disk with
> the wrong label? You can correct that with an zpool export x220pool /
> zpool import -d /dev/diskid x220pool
>

gpart see only one disk ada0 (OCZ), if believe camcontrol ada0
(Corsair) - OCZ (ada1) why zpool status see two disk and not error

x220pool - root file system I'm would not like to break it



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BK5SrNzqiQKQaPRV0wUkysC0XtFQQLa3SzKcKctUe2%2BaJdmTA>