From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 24 13:34:02 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0151344A8C for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12CE086CC5; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:ab:50::42:42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: mat/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 743F6135D5; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 14:33:58 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Walter Schwarzenfeld Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: category qt? Message-ID: <20181224133358.qzoqzzw6beqgjzyl@ogg.in.absolight.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vatozvqmpr6lkspw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180622 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 12CE086CC5 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.96 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.962,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:34:02 -0000 --vatozvqmpr6lkspw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 11:06:56AM +0100, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > The qt* ports spreads around in the whole portstree. >=20 > It is reasonable to concentrate all these ports in a qt category? I think= it > is easier to find (and also easier to maintain). While a virtual category could easily be added (by having USES=3Dqt add it automatically) a physical category makes little sense. It would be like having all the p5- ports put in a perl directory. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --vatozvqmpr6lkspw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEOraXidLtEhBkQLpbOkUW81GDzkgFAlwg4EZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNB QjY5Nzg5RDJFRDEyMTA2NDQwQkE1QjNBNDUxNkYzNTE4M0NFNDgACgkQOkUW81GD zkgE5g//cdgs7O0mf7CI47fq6ye8HF123amB6o2UuvMIuZgMJ8sV0Rax+ePax0WW 2ZjiyQE/aYnVre2X3jWgryk++BDm1JhaOpkD6Zi145dOQPxpSy+gbBQeBuE+ftWN dtaYon0yiU+F7gYzXVg16dNOQRZ3LMnUdYSN43kebTS2GBGeYy1eEaiQLIpKpAzJ Bh9MFskyI+d9k1aae4wHiEA5eBX7AeV8Dg6Dl4+pEA7cVmoonBP7rvXHTYraKZJf w8mhVrQKqftpV2uZb2T6dSUlGyx+qM5tFUeFvyY19D14Xlktd3s9bfwWfOz5WbKL dj3ukoAGvYBigPE8xfz9lkeZHpiomgHL+K5XkzuhUNLvhjd+ez424n0wmDeXqiq5 wrdJFJiu5DKYFJ4zerX8oWU4kK0ZWJ7PYq+/Atx4/ixrt9UtMCR6n6IhpB+ZPE+x Pcf8t3KO4gpzN3ar5fBA0oJCqvd9YDoHED0LZrYJWEUaglf47bOlVqOX7Jn6kl4z bEi98u3dWtow3UsJrmbu1tbB6VlF+ExS3tujoUTRYAG1A40vAiCa8AGHc+poKoot +Jx/ThqpNx+R9d4dYLO5hhieNKZHjXk0GYEx2t+SuVggSzdLh7Cpjqimy2qa9l2l 73EiWMEWzhon/Lpj5eglfKdObCesiSo82rK/lYEgcxBRG8LNX8c= =iu48 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vatozvqmpr6lkspw--