Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 01:01:53 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Joshua Lee <yid@softhome.net> Cc: root@utility.clubscholarship.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inuring FreeBSD to the apache bug without upgrading apache ? Message-ID: <3D12DD71.65F531A5@mindspring.com> References: <20020620141424.U68572-100000@utility.clubscholarship.com> <3D129688.356A87D0@mindspring.com> <20020621022930.088904b7.yid@softhome.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joshua Lee wrote: > > The way you would deal with this would be to tell Apache that it > > was an HTTP 1.0 server, since chunking is an HTTP 1.1 feature. > > > > The only place this is an issue is if you need to reuse an HTTP > > connection, and that only occurs in HTTP 1.1 when you are doing > > pipelining. Everywhere else, you can indicate an end of data > > Mozilla has an option to enable http pipelining as a performance option. > I regularly used this, maybe I shouldn't? It depends. Does it still use 4 outstanding connections to the server on the other end, or does it serialize all your picture download requests through a single pipe? If the latter, what is the measured latency between the end of one response and the beginning of another? Basically, this is going to boild down to how the web server on the back end is written, and what's between you and it, in the way of smart hardware. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D12DD71.65F531A5>