From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 19 12:41:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6060D106566C for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:41:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375A58FC1E for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A19FB91E; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:41:42 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org, Shane Ambler Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:31:12 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p17; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201209190810.q8J8AE8a076319@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201209190810.q8J8AE8a076319@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209190831.12030.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:41:42 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Subject: Re: threads/165173: [build] clang buildworld breaks libthr X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:41:43 -0000 On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 4:10:14 am Shane Ambler wrote: > The following reply was made to PR threads/165173; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Shane Ambler > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD@Shaneware.biz > Cc: > Subject: Re: threads/165173: [build] clang buildworld breaks libthr > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:29:44 +0930 > > I don't see this issue in releng/9.1 - r240648 > but it still exists in releng/9.0 as of r239108 > > Any plans to fix releng/9.0 ? > if not this can be closed. It is very doubtful that anyone will fix this in 9.0. -- John Baldwin