Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Apr 2003 06:52:24 -0700
From:      "Earl A. Killian" <earl@killian.com>
To:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   nat vs. state
Message-ID:  <16021.30488.437183.530248@sax.killian.com>

Next in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Is it safe to assume packets diverted to NAT are "safe" and don't need
further checking?  In particular, can the use of dynamic/stateful
rules be skipped for NAT packets?  It seems so, because NAT is already
stateful.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16021.30488.437183.530248>