From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 9 22:33:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFC31065672 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:33:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CCE8FC0A for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:33:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 765A91E002A6; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:33:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from triton.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triton.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n59MUw6T017093; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:30:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@triton.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by triton.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n59MUwZE017092; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:30:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:30:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen Lock Message-Id: <200906092230.n59MUwZE017092@triton.kn-bremen.de> To: dougb@FreeBSD.org X-Newsgroups: local.list.freebsd.current In-Reply-To: <4A2ED03E.8080803@FreeBSD.org> References: <567878105.142658.1244281258275.JavaMail.apache@mail51.abv.bg> Organization: home X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:43:45 +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Mario Pavlov , Jacques Fourie Subject: Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:33:09 -0000 In article <4A2ED03E.8080803@FreeBSD.org> you write: >With this patch I still get an instant panic when I try to kldload >vboxdrv. Same as the ones I've reported previously. > >It would be really great if someone wanted to look at this issue, not >only would I really like to give virtualbox a try, but we're rapidly >approaching the code freeze and if there is a fix for 8.x that is >needed for this I'd hate to see it miss the deadline. > >Doug While we are talking about the 8.0 deadline... Do we want to do anything about the `calcru: runtime went backwards ...' messages in virtual machines? See this patch (and thread:) http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2009-April/005950.html (I've seen this in vbox also, and there are mentions of this for vmware and ms virtual server in the list archives too so despite the subject this is not really qemu specific.) Cheers, Juergen