Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 01:08:15 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie.le-hen@epita.fr> To: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bad shared library ordering Message-ID: <20040913230815.GB16110@garak.epita.fr> In-Reply-To: <1095115132.3305.3.camel@server.mcneil.com> References: <1095106952.9560.14.camel@server.mcneil.com> <20040913235337.Y8412@fw.reifenberger.com> <1095115132.3305.3.camel@server.mcneil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This isn't what I was alluding to. Yes, since I discovered this I've
> deleted the package and I'm rebuilding everything. Don't even need
> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE set. I think the issue is that, perhaps, rpath is
> being used and so the /usr/local/lib version wins. If this is the case
> then I see nothing wrong and I just need to do some cleanup.
I suppose you know about the /etc/ld-elf.so.conf file described in section
FILES of ldconfig(8) manual page ; but the granularity is unfortunately
per-directory, and I think the only way to link with a specific library
instead of the first-coming one is to use tricky options of ld(1). You
may want to see -l and the -L one.
--
Jeremie LE HEN aka TtZ/TataZ jeremie.le-hen@epita.fr
ttz@epita.fr
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040913230815.GB16110>