Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:12:49 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> To: "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Scheduler in Various Docs Message-ID: <47938F21.6020308@math.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <479388C0.50507@highperformance.net> References: <479388C0.50507@highperformance.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jason C. Wells wrote: > The comments regarding SCHED_ULE and SCHED_4BSD are inconsistent with > information found in the email archives. LINT says ULE is experimental. > The handbook doesn't mention ULE at all. The archives say ULE is the > new recommended scheduler. > > If ULE is in fact the current recommendation, then a few docs need to be > updated. To add to Jason's point - why does GENERIC still default to SCHED_4BSD? Are there plans to change this before 7.0 is truly released?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47938F21.6020308>