Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Sergei Kolobov <sergei@kolobov.com>
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/54473: port update: security/firewalk 1.0 -> 5.0
Message-ID:  <200307151010.h6FAAMhO084925@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/54473; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@kolobov.com>
To: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org>, Yonatan@xpert.com
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/54473: port update: security/firewalk 1.0 -> 5.0
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:48:59 +0400

 On 2003-07-14 at 08:26 -0700, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
 > Synopsis: port update: security/firewalk 1.0 -> 5.0
 > 
 > AFAIK firewalk still depends from net/libnet-devel
 > and net/libdnet.  Last is broken for FreeBSD, because
 > it do not support ipfw2.  Any idea?
 
 FYI - I have submitted PRs to update net/libnet and net/libnet-devel to
 the latest versions:
 
 ports/54386 - update net/libnet to 1.1.0
 ports/54421 - update net/libnet-devel to 1.1.1-RC-005
 
 Since 1.1.0 is now a stable version, and since firewalk 5.0 needs 
 at least that version, it may now depend on net/libnet 
 (obviously, after committing 54386) instead of net/libnet-devel.
 
 As far as net/libdnet - yes, it is broken on 5.x. Nonetheless, it should
 be useable under 4.x.
 
 Sergei



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200307151010.h6FAAMhO084925>