From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 17:29:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566DE16A408 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2621A13C44B for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: (qmail 38559 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2007 17:29:57 -0000 Received: from ppp-71-139-35-160.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO ?10.0.5.59?) (nate-mail@71.139.35.160) by root.org with ESMTPA; 16 Mar 2007 17:29:57 -0000 Message-ID: <45FAD457.7050803@root.org> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:31:03 -0700 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070214) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jung-uk Kim References: <200703161256.23996.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200703161256.23996.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: acpi@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] ACPI-CA 20070126 import X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:29:58 -0000 Jung-uk Kim wrote: > I will import ACPI-CA 20070126 from Intel some time next week. > Current mega-patch against -CURRENT is here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica-import-20070126.diff.gz > > (Note: Sorry, I had to gzip(1) it because it was too big.) > > This patch should fix many ACPI issues in -CURRENT (ACPI-CA 20051021), > most notably memory leak. Full change log for ACPI-CA from the last > import is here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica_changes_20051021_20070126.txt > > I believe it is quite stable because I have been using this patch on > my primary desktop and laptop for a while and it was tested on amd64, > i386, and ia64. However, since the patch is huge, I may have missed > something. If you find something wrong, please let me know before it > is too late. ;-) Thank you very much for all your work. You've even improved other things along the way, not just the import. To clarify, this patch has also been run by me for a while and will be committed so if you're at all interested in testing, be sure to do so. If not, just accept the consequences via cvsup. And no whining! >:-) -- Nate