Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 10:17:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Richard Seaman <dick@tar.com> Cc: Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org>, Wiliam Woods <wwoods@cybcon.com>, "Kevin G. Eliuk" <kevin_eliuk@sunshine.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Trouble with Staroffice5.0 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901051014050.391-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <19990102111905.I2862@tar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2 Jan 1999, Richard Seaman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 1999 at 11:18:26AM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > > I finally got it up and running too, but I had to do a lot voodoo :] It > > > won't work, as it errs in the middle of its BASIC registration script. Does > > > anyone have a registration code they can share, or some other way to get one? > > > > I had that. From the newsgroups, this is a common failure. Try running > > setup again and telling it to repair your installation. Failing that, try > > uninstalling and reinstalling. Worked for me, YMMV. > > When I had problems with registration, I unistalled, reinstalled, and then > set the default PATH to include the Office50/bin directory. I had assumed > that the reason it worked the second time was that I managed to set the > PATH variable. But, maybe the deinstall/reinstall did something too. > > I'm also interested in a message you posted a few days ago, that SO50 runs > on an SMP machine without threads. I guess I (and others) had assumed the > reason SO50 hadn't worked before was because it needed a functioning > linux_clone and the rest of the linux threads emulation to work. Perhaps > this wasn't true. In working on the linux threads emulation, and also > on SO50, a bug in linux_pipe was discovered and fixed. Perhaps this was > all that kept SO50 from running? Maybe it just needs the fixed linux_pipe > and thats all? > > I haven't tried SO50 without the linux threads patches, but it might > be interesting for someone to try it with the linux_pipe patches > (included by default in -current sources after about Dec 10) but without > any of the other linux threads patches enabled (ie. compiled without > COMPAT_LINUX_THREADS). Presumably you would still need the proc > cmdline patches. Sorry for the delay in replying - I've been recovering from the 'flu. I haven't yet tested the SO50 install on an SMP machine (I was using a UP kernel when originally installing and using SO). The kernel is compiled with the COMPAT_LINUX_THREADS option but I doubt if it makes a difference. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.01.9901051014050.391-100000>