Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:05:44 -0700 From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> To: John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: current to 6-stable merge plans/policy Message-ID: <46029B48.9000906@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <20070322092609.GA58744@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> References: <20070322092609.GA58744@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Hay wrote: > Hi Guys, > > What are the ideas (policy) about merging the arm/ixp425/avila stuff > to 6-stable? I see some arm stuff gets merged, but it does not look > like everything? Is it just that people merge what they need? > > Just trying to get a feel for it. Up to now I have used 6-stable on > our soekris and wrap boards, but we are probably going to use the > Avila boards a bit more, so I was wondering if I should use -current > or 6-stable on them. Up to now my Avila and ADI testing was done with > -current, but I'm not sure if that is a good idea for boxes that will > end up in rural areas far far away. Hmm. Not that I have seen a panic > on the Avila boards, but they have gone through a lot less testing up > to now. Not sure what's been missed. I see no reason not to MFC anything arm-related unless it breaks code compatibility (and even there it's unlikely there are 3rd party codes to worry about). Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46029B48.9000906>