From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 23 19:33:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B09616A4B3; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:33:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-253.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4081C43FF5; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:33:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE39566CFA; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B5DC77CA; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:33:43 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: John Birrell Message-ID: <20030924023343.GA55583@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030924021820.GA55388@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030924023205.GK34649@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030924023205.GK34649@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: deischen@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Initial list of ports that fail due to -pthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 02:33:45 -0000 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:32:05PM +1000, John Birrell wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect > > PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I > > just grepped for the "-pthread is deprecated" error message). None of > > these were fixed by ports/57047. It is likely that there are many > > more that also need to be fixed - either they fail in other ways, or > > are hidden by depending on another port that currently fails. >=20 > I had a go at fixing some of the ones listed on your status page. I start= ed > with the ones that had the greatest number of dependencies. >=20 > The thing I'm not sure about is whether there is consensus that the > -pthread argument should be removed from GCC. I've supported Dan's > approach because I understand the background. I think there have been a > few too many "don't do that" emails. Won't these ports still need to be fixed to look at PTHREAD_{LIBS,CFLAGS} though, since the correct values for 4.x and 5.x will still be different? Kris --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQE/cQKHWry0BWjoQKURAsZeAJd/PEc3JwJqGmPtkwBfAmu6933RAKCgIN7E E/9b7aP34yTP4TNigwvrew== =vvRP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--