Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:32:51 +0000
From:      Rod <funkyrod@gmail.com>
To:        "Greg Lewis" <glewis@eyesbeyond.com>
Cc:        freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is JNI (Java Native Interface) Known to Work in Both Directions on FreeBSD (to invoke the JVM from native software)?
Message-ID:  <dbe5b4eb0803310632n7c1cde15n1c0357948cc09ea8@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080330151625.GA8977@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
References:  <dbe5b4eb0803282336p5143c5a3ub15113eaef799668@mail.gmail.com> <20080330075658.GA6492@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <dbe5b4eb0803300123h67c48c36r777e32c785183c6f@mail.gmail.com> <20080330151625.GA8977@misty.eyesbeyond.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Guys

Thanks for your help with this.
After re-building jdk16, I was able to run the simple c++ invocation program
to invoke a JVM via the JNI.
For some reason however, I still get the SIGSYS with R and rJava so I'll
contact the rJava developers next.

Regards

Rod.

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 08:23:52AM +0000, Rod wrote:
> > I built the jdk16 originally under a FreeBSD7.0 installation that I had
> > updated to 7-Release from pre-release via buildworld/buildkernel.
> >
> > The output below was from running under a fresh install of
> > 7.0-Releaseinstalled from the
> > 7.0-Release binaries (from the CDs). I installed the jdk16 that I had
> built
> > under the older buildworlded 7.0-Release onto the fresh binary installed
> > 7.0-Release (which I installed clean specifically to investigate this
> > problem).
> >
> > I'm now rebuilding jdk16 under the fresh 7.0-Release to see if that
> helps.
>
> Sounds like a sensible thing to try.
>
> > Thanks for your help so far everyone - I've posted some further details
> > (output log from the invocation test program).
> >
> > Greg I'm not sure what you're referring to regarding removal of KSE
> > syscalls.  What would be the implications in this situation?
>
> My bad, that has only happened in -current not in 7.x, so ignore that.  I
> was thinking of a reason that you'd get a SIGSYS (which means you're
> invoking a non-existent syscall).  Removal of the KSE syscalls would fit
> that, but it hasn't happened in 7.x so that can't be the case.
>
> --
> Greg Lewis                          Email   : glewis@eyesbeyond.com
> Eyes Beyond                         Web     : http://www.eyesbeyond.com
> Information Technology              FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dbe5b4eb0803310632n7c1cde15n1c0357948cc09ea8>