Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:25:05 +0200 From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> To: Anthony Jenkins <Anthony.B.Jenkins@att.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Armin Gruner <ag@muc.de> Subject: Re: sysctl hw.acpi.acline Message-ID: <CAFYkXj=7pa6mECqjWnpAyE%2BB7MhDFb8KPYfbWa0-hGW67ki1bw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <539F6B3F.2000308@att.net> References: <CAFYkXj=cN=A7ZRs-N5xoER51=daMaaS4uBCQLpfnOC0=Mg0WuA@mail.gmail.com> <539F56E9.8070809@muc.de> <CAFYkXjn4nxAcvZjsjUR5HPz6tY_rNyb5Hg98QtaK3n0hGZxPFA@mail.gmail.com> <539F6B3F.2000308@att.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Anthony Jenkins <Anthony.B.Jenkins@att.net> wrote: > The absence of hw.acpi.battery and child oids probably implies there is no battery and the system may be assumed to be on line (A/C) power. Hello Anthony! I would prefer to have that information clearly defined in the manual :-) I guessed that this is a quick fix to first check the OID existence, but if manual tells there is such OID it should be there, even if there is no battery, huh? This is why I consider this to be a bug :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFYkXj=7pa6mECqjWnpAyE%2BB7MhDFb8KPYfbWa0-hGW67ki1bw>