Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:31:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207081130540.2035@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <4FF952FB.10200@FreeBSD.org> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org> <0AFE3C4A-22DB-4134-949F-4D05BBFC4C6C@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8CA35.7040209@FreeBSD.org> <CA%2BtpaK1R1miXTJv8YJUMZWQcKFk7RPDePDBiCEMdWHZX=qksSQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FF952FB.10200@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> line with ours. So in the short term (as in, the next few years) we're > better off with unbound in the base. > > The ideal, long-term solution is to re-think what "The Base" is, and > give users more flexibility at install time. Unfortunately, there is a making base as minimal as possible give you exactly that! > knee-jerk "zomg, we don't want to be like linux!" reaction to that idea it is proper reaction.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1207081130540.2035>