From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 14:20:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 049A818B for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A98F9B53 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-49.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t09EJrGG005976 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 08:19:54 -0600 Message-ID: <54AFE500.8030503@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 08:26:08 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?B?6Ieq5Yqo5Zue5aSN77yaUGxzIHJlbW92ZSBtZSBJIGhhdmUgYmU=?= =?UTF-8?B?ZW4gaGFja2VkISEh?= References: <20150108231912.C874F48940C@agent02.agent.vmail.yz.sinanode.com> <54AF13F6.5070105@kicp.uchicago.edu> <54AF1AEF.5080807@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54AF1AEF.5080807@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 14:20:02 -0000 On 01/08/15 18:03, zep wrote: > On 01/08/2015 06:34 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Is that only me or others noticed too that every first message of new >> thread on this list if followed by junk like this. This apparently was >> delivered from domain >> >> sina.com.cn >> >> Would that be reasonable to reject all mail of that origin on the MX >> level? >> >> Sorry about sending spam in name of fighting spam. >> >> Valeri >> > I suspect it's a vacation auto responder, although I have no idea how to > translate the message. > it's poor form, but I'm not sure it rises to the level of being a good > reason to block a person's entire domain. although if it keeps going > on, I could well see asking the list admins to remove/block the person > doing all the sending. > My ISP has some very effective SPAM filtering & I am catching a bunch of this crap there, besides whatever slithers through to my inbox .... I 2nd the motion on a domain block, or at least a blacklist of this address .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.