Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Jul 1998 16:59:41 +0000
From:      "Frank Pawlak" <fpawlak@execpc.com>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, jasone@canonware.com, smoergrd@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com
Cc:        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Microsoft's breaches of contract (was: FBSD license and multiple copyright holders)
Message-ID:  <980704165941.ZM2483@darkstar.connect.com>
In-Reply-To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> "Microsoft's breaches of contract (was: FBSD license and multiple copyright holders)" (Jul  4,  4:58pm)
References:  <rx4ogv71jwn.fsf@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com>  <199807040703.BAA02533@softweyr.com>  <19980704165817.D358@freebie.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 4,  4:58pm, Greg Lehey wrote:
> Subject: Microsoft's breaches of contract (was: FBSD license and multiple
> On Saturday,  4 July 1998 at  1:03:39 -0600, Wes Peters wrote:
> > My hidden microphone recorded  (Dag-Erling Coidan Sm?rgrav)
> > (smoergrd@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com) saying:
> >
> >> Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> writes:
> >>> As the standard FBSD license reads, it seems to me that anyone who
> >>> distributes a binary-only FreeBSD-based product is legally required to
> >>> print reams of copyright notices in the documentation.  That sucks for
the
> >>> distributor and for the customers.
> >>
> >> It's there for a reason. I can't understand why UCB hasn't sued the
> >> pants off Microsoft yet... The monkeys in Redmond are shipping
> >> software under Berkeley license without including the proper magic
> >> incantations in their advertising material or documentation.
> >>
> >> Wouldn't it be a ball to see Microsoft print "This product includes
> >> software developed at the University of California, Berkeley" on the
> >> cover of every single Windows 98 or Windows NT CD?
> >
> > You'll find exactly those kinds of copyright notices on the Intel
> > Internet Station, the little dial-up router I worked on last year.
> > You find them there, and on the "Legal Stuff" web page in the user
> > interface, only because I put them into the web page myself, and
> > raised such a stink about the lack of notices in the documentation
> > and got the legal department involved, over the strenuous objections
> > of the doc writer.  To their credit, the opinion from the legal
> > department was rendered in mere hours, and boiled down to "put the
> > copyright notices into the documentation or don't ship the product."
>
> :-)
>
> About 2 years ago I did a short contract for Siemens-Nixdorf in
> Germany.  One of the things I did was some modifications to syslogd,
> and I noticed to my horror that they had removed the copyright.  OK, I
> was supposed to fix it, so I fixed that as well.  After I had left,
> one of my colleagues (Jürgen Krause, one of the authors of the
> original FreeBSD ISDN package, with whom, just by chance, I was
> working) called me up and said "Greg, something seems to have gone
> wrong with your commit.  You have the FreeBSD syslogd in there
> instead".  I don't know if it's still in there, or whether they took
> it out again.
>
> > We researched copyright notices as diligently as possible in the
> > time we had, given that Wind River Systems had removed the original
> > copyright notices from much of the code, and credited UC Berkely,
> > CMU, and the ISC.
> >
> > Why Microsoft cannot do the same is beyond me.  Somebody oughtta
> > take'em to court.  Maybe Scott McNealy would loan us the bucks,
> > on contingency?  ;^)
>
> Now if there's one thing that *really* pisses me off, it's that nobody
> has stopped Microsoft from shipping Internet Exploder because it is in
> breach of contract.  I would have hoped that Sun could say "ship it
> with correct Java, ship it without Java, or don't ship it".  If they
> can't get that done, I don't see that they can help us in what is
> primarily a matter of recognition.
>
> Greg

Greg, arn't Sun and Microsoft presently in litigation over this very issue?  I
know that SUN has brought suit against Microsoft for their bastardising of
Java, and I think that it also relates to IE as well.

Frank

> --
> See complete headers for address and phone numbers
> finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
>-- End of excerpt from Greg Lehey



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?980704165941.ZM2483>