Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:10:03 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), dg@root.com, darrend@novell.com, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux 96 (my impressions) - Reply Message-ID: <199609041910.NAA01549@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199609041905.MAA07109@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199609041735.LAA00851@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199609041905.MAA07109@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The point is that it is wrong to fault Theo for not taking on the task > of putting it in a form suitable to pass the NetBSD and FreeBSD "not > invented here" rejection filters. Theo's current statement I've fixed a *huge* security bug, but I'm not telling you what it is: vs. I've fixed a *huge* security bug in rdist. Or I've fixed a *huge* security hole in the kernel involving the setuid() function call. Remember what you've fixed in *NOT* that hard, and since he went to the trouble to check if FreeBSD had the fix, it's evidently more of a 'nyah, nyah, I've got a fix that you don't' attitude then one of "I'm overworked and don't remember." Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609041910.NAA01549>