From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 21 20:34:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7000C10656A5 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22528FC28 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25627 invoked by uid 399); 21 Dec 2009 20:34:21 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 21 Dec 2009 20:34:21 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4B2FDBD1.7030808@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:34:25 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hajimu UMEMOTO References: <200912200134.nBK1YCAA048942@svn.freebsd.org> <4B2DBB51.9060002@FreeBSD.org> <4B2DD2A1.8060907@FreeBSD.org> <4B2E84CF.2060902@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r200743 - in head/usr.sbin: . service X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:34:22 -0000 Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:10:55 -0800 >>>>>> Doug Barton said: > > dougb> I agree to making the change you suggested, but I would like to > dougb> quibble over the format. Isn't the attached patch equivalent, and > dougb> simpler? What is the value of setting HOME and PATH in the environment > dougb> if we're just going to use 'env -i HOME PATH' anyway? > > Yup, your attached patch is equivalent. However, I prefer the > previous one. In anyway, I don't have a strong opinion around here. Thanks for confirming. My preference generally is for things to be simple and clear which makes them less confusing down the road. I've committed the patch I posted. Thanks again to everyone who offered their feedback. I'll wait a little longer before MFC'ing this, but I do want to get it in ASAP. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/