From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 23 03:54:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229F416A4CE; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:54:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F6443D5E; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:54:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mail.alpha-tierchen.de (port-212-202-39-77.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.77]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B17123939; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:53:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.alpha-tierchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34A3CCD843; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:54:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.alpha-tierchen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (alpha-tierchen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73235-01; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:54:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (alpha.local [192.168.1.2]) by mail.alpha-tierchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA10CCD828; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:54:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4240E890.4010909@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:54:56 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050318) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <4240D891.6040708@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20050323025821.GA24378@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050323025821.GA24378@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at alpha-tierchen.de cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: knu@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sometimes port installation fails with DEPENDS_TARGET=package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:54:33 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > What about 'make package-recursive'? `make package-recursive` works without complications, but 'package-recursive' has some minor disadvantages, e.g. it creates always packages of all dependencies and obviously does not take pkgtools.conf into account. The error itself is not a problem for me, because I know how to work around. Just now I discovered that defining PACKAGE_BUILDING might saves me from interruptions in future. It's not a real solution and it wasn't a real problem at all; it's just a little bit craggy. Thanks Regards Björn