Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Jul 1997 17:48:08 -0400
From:      "Larry S. Marso" <lsmarso@panix.com>
To:        jbrinkley@crosslogic.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ghostscript; visual quality of text
Message-ID:  <19970723174808.51946@panix.com>
In-Reply-To: <852564DD.0062D32C.00@love.crosslogic.com>; from jbrinkley@crosslogic.com on Wed, Jul 23, 1997 at 02:02:35PM -0400
References:  <852564DD.0062D32C.00@love.crosslogic.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Uh, that'd be FreeBSD.  Ghostscript included with the OS, not any of the
alternatives in the ports.  Would you recommend one?

-- 
Larry S. Marso
lsmarso@panix.com

On Wed, Jul 23, 1997 at 02:02:35PM -0400, jbrinkley@crosslogic.com wrote:
> 
> Which version of Ghostscript are you using, and with what OS?
> 
> silverwing
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Larry S. Marso" <lsmarso@panix.com> on 07/23/97 01:17:34 PM
> 
> To:   freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> cc:
> Subject:  ghostscript; visual quality of text
> 
> I notice that ghostscript produces a pretty lousy image (in terms of
> resolution) when I use it to display *.ps files of articles and manuals.
> It is *much* worse than a similarly configured Linux box I had a year ago.
> However, I note that xdvi displays much higher quality images, even of the
> postscript fonts (while it can't display embedded postscript images, which
> is why I'm trying to use ghostscript).
> Any ideas?
> --
> Larry S. Marso
> lsmarso@panix.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970723174808.51946>