Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 19:46:36 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <dyson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: mike@smith.net.au, nate@mt.sri.com, dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernfs/procfs questions... Message-ID: <199806050046.TAA01103@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199806042222.QAA04845@mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Jun 4, 98 04:22:53 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams said: > > I argue shouldn't be exposed to the users then. If it's exposed, it > should be documented. In other words, sysctl should go away since very > few (if any) of it's knobs are documented except accidentally. > Send-pr each individual sysctl, and responsible parties can fix them, and they can be prioritized. Changing things that you aren't responsible for is irresponsible. -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806050046.TAA01103>