From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Jul 28 20: 8:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from TYO203.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO203.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.211]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F77215508 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 20:08:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mihara@prd.fc.nec.co.jp) Received: from mailsv.nec.co.jp ([192.168.1.90]) by TYO203.gate.nec.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W99072610) with ESMTP id MAA28555; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:06:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from ayrton.prd.fc.nec.co.jp (ayrton.prd.fc.nec.co.jp [10.32.194.1]) by mailsv.nec.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-MAILSV-NEC) with ESMTP id MAA27392; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:06:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from oz.prd.fc.nec.co.jp (oz.prd.fc.nec.co.jp [10.32.193.3]) by ayrton.prd.fc.nec.co.jp (8.8.8/3.6W-98052009) with ESMTP id MAA21531; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:06:26 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:06:23 +0900 Message-ID: <14239.50479.269090.25699A@oz.prd.fc.nec.co.jp> From: Osamu MIHARA To: hosokawa@itc.keio.ac.jp Cc: mihara@prd.fc.nec.co.jp, mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3C574TX for -current (Re: 3COM Megahertz 10/100 LAN+56K Modem (3CCFEM556BI)) In-Reply-To: In your message of "Sat, 24 Jul 1999 00:21:52 +0900 (JST)" <199907231521.AAA02396@afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp> References: <14226.34351.40295.87915G@mosra.prd.fc.nec.co.jp> <199907231521.AAA02396@afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp> User-Agent: Wanderlust/1.0.3 (Notorious) SEMI/1.13.4 (Terai) FLIM/1.12.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Y=FEzaki?=) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 3) (Acadia) (i386-unknown-freebsd3.2) Organization: NEC Corporation, Tokyo Japan MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.4 - "Terai") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At Sat, 24 Jul 1999 00:21:52 +0900 (JST), HOSOKAWA Tatsumi wrote: > I merged it into if_ep driver and it worked on 3C574TX (I think my Great! > patch does not break anything for other ep cards), but it did not work > when I added offset 0x10 to the I/O address when accessing window 1 > like your code does. > > I used only 2bit address shift in accessing EEPROM and it worked on > 3C574TX. Perhaps there can be difference between 574 and 556. If you > can, please test following patch on -current. I'm extremely busy these days and will be offline next week. I'll try your patch on -current, if I can. -- Osamu MIHARA // NEC Printers Division To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message