From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 22:06:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EF216A4CE; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:06:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (eos.ocn.ne.jp [222.146.51.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7F743D1F; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:06:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from delta.allbsd.org (p43012-adsao12honb4-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [219.161.232.12]) by smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5EA42F8; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:06:06 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by delta.allbsd.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8KM5ibT010904; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:05:45 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:05:24 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040921.070524.21936977.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <20040920211839.GA15066@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200409201934.i8KJYfcS036447@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040921.054126.07648742.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> <20040920211839.GA15066@hub.freebsd.org> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.68 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep_21_07_05_25_2004_645)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en index.xsl X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:06:08 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep_21_07_05_25_2004_645)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "David O'Brien" wrote in <20040920211839.GA15066@hub.freebsd.org>: obrien> On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 05:41:26AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: obrien> > I would like to make it clear that FreeBSD supports EM64T obrien> > by using the Intel's architecture name because the word obrien> > AMD64 can confuse the users. Is that unacceptable? obrien> obrien> If I can list AMD Athlon, AMD K6, AMD K5, VIA, Cyrix, Transmeta, National obrien> Semiconductor, IBM, etc... in the list rather than "x86 compatible". For obrien> Alpha we would need to add Samsung, who also made some Alpha dirivitives. obrien> For Sparc64 we would need to add Fujitsu. These you mentioned are not architecture name. And the terms AMD64 and EM64T have a bit complicated history, so to mention the both should help the users. If you prefer "X compatible" for the consistency, why did you keep the others and remove EM64T only? As you already mentioned, there are "Alpha compatible," "PC-98 compatible," and "Sparc64 compatible." obrien> People owning Intel EM64T machines well know that it is a copy of the obrien> AMD64 platform. I think it should be explicitly stated as long as there are questions like the following: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?411B8E17.5020409 http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040807004555.14650.qmail http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200408121227.51268.jkim -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep_21_07_05_25_2004_645)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBT1QlTyzT2CeTzy0RAqwuAKCLrl/pncCSLUmTah2AIjS46PuVfQCfXn/4 pBZPtCcIBfPcQBLZokLKuS0= =FExq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep_21_07_05_25_2004_645)----