From owner-freebsd-current Fri Feb 19 11: 5:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mortar.carlson.com (mortar.carlson.com [208.240.12.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2BB11B83; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 11:05:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@visi.com) Received: from mortar.carlson.com (root@localhost) by mortar.carlson.com with ESMTP id NAA15305; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 13:04:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from w142844 ([172.25.99.35]) by mortar.carlson.com with SMTP id NAA15301; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 13:04:41 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <028f01be5c3a$d50b51e0$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: , "Satoshi Asami" Cc: , , , Subject: Re: removing f2c from base distribution Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 13:05:35 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG There is a [good?] g77 port built into egcs-1.1.1, although I have never used it. Why would gcc-2.8.x be the stock compiler versus the [better?] egcs-1.1.x? C++ comes along for free in all it's glory. Tom Veldhouse veldy@visi.com >If it is decided that Fortran support will disappear from the base >system and nobody else wants to maintain g77, I will gladly do >it. However, I will only maintain a version that I am using so that >means I will maintain a port once gcc 2.8 is officially brought in as >the stock compiler. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message