Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:13:14 -0500 From: "Larry Rosenman" <ler@lerctr.org> To: "'Arno J. Klaassen'" <arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr>, <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export Message-ID: <00b301ca5739$8e9b3850$abd1a8f0$@org> In-Reply-To: <wpbpjtwwg7.fsf@heho.snv.jussieu.fr> References: <wpbpjtwwg7.fsf@heho.snv.jussieu.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ZFS makes its own version of the exports file. Just do it that way, and be safe. You can pass the full set of NFS options in the sharenfs parameter.... --=20 Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org = [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Arno J. Klaassen Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 6:46 PM To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export Hello, I googled a bit on this question but could not find a clear answer : is there any risk/inconvenience/advantage in exporting a ZFS-fs by just putting it in /etc/exports the old way and leaving the 'sharenfs' option on the filesystem off? I'd like to replace a UFS-based server serving mostly linux-clients which work well now with a ZFS-fs, and somehow am a bit waterfearing changing the nfs=E8options which worked great till now. Thank you in advance, regards, Arno _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00b301ca5739$8e9b3850$abd1a8f0$>